By Agendas: Vilja Toomast

The discourse is formal, neutral, and strictly informative, typical of a commission rapporteur's style. The emphasis is on logical and procedural reporting, presenting facts regarding the proceedings of the commission meeting and the decisions adopted. Emotional or rhetorical devices are entirely absent.

The style of the speech is formal, neutral, and procedural, suitable for the role of the committee rapporteur in the Riigikogu. The focus is on logical appeal and the presentation of facts, highlighting the three main topics discussed within the committee. Emotional assessments or personal viewpoints are absent.

The style is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural, focusing on conveying the minutes and discussions of the Legal Committee meeting. The presenter balances the logical arguments of various parties (the government, the bill's initiator, the committee chairman), while avoiding emotional appeals. The presentation is comprehensive and adheres to a chronological structure.

The speaker's style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral presentation of the commission's decisions and voting results. He uses logical arguments to justify the doubling of fines and the complexity of linking them to income. There are also emotional appeals, emphasizing that the experience of a fine or detention center stays with a person for life and makes them more careful.

The style of discourse is formal, neutral, and highly procedural, focusing on the accurate summation of the committee's debate, the questions posed, and the minister's responses. The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and the presentation of facts (voting results, ministerial explanations), rather than on emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the brief and concise presentation of the minutes. The speaker uses logical appeals, presenting factual data regarding the bill's procedure, the content of the proposed amendments, and the voting results. The tone is businesslike and purposeful, aiming to save colleagues' time by summarizing lengthy protocols.

The style of the speech is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the brief presentation of the Legal Committee's decisions and discussions. A logical and fact-based approach is employed, avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is businesslike and concise, emphasizing brevity ("That is, in short, everything").