By Months: Madis Timpson

Supports the budget and defends the Reform Party's role in its preparation, dismissing allegations that the budget contains no positive elements. Concern is expressed regarding the inefficient use of taxpayer funds (specifically, the engagement of law firms in the legislative process). Furthermore, the question is raised regarding the fair and optimal salary level for members of the Riigikogu and the government, exclusive of any additional fees or bonuses.

Economic perspectives stress the optimization of costs and the saving of public funds, particularly in the management of healthcare stocks, where the expense of rotating these supplies will henceforth be borne by the hospitals. Regarding state charges, a balanced approach is favored, ensuring that fees are not based strictly on the cost principle, thereby preventing the non-provision of social services. In the area of unemployment insurance, discussions cover the basic rate of compensation and the supplementary funding (1.7 million euros) allocated for subsistence benefits.

Economic viewpoints center on the financial sustainability and legal compliance of healthcare and social services. Concern is raised over the utilization of the Health Insurance Fund’s reserves and the coverage of fixed costs, along with the necessity of reviewing the Fund’s long-term financing structure. Regarding the increase in state fees, modernization is supported, as the additional cost of 79,000 euros is considered marginal compared to the 400 million euro volume of the pharmaceutical market.

Supports the development of the domestic defense industry and requests forecasts regarding the creation of new, highly compensated jobs. Is clearly opposed to the progressive income tax and criticizes the wasting of state resources on excessive measurement and planning.

There is not enough data.