By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The political position is highly focused on procedure and oriented towards quality, demanding strict adherence to the principles of good law-making, as set out in the document "Fundamentals of Legislative Policy until 2030". The speaker emphasizes minimal state intervention and the avoidance of over-regulation, placing the assurance of a constitutional legal order at the forefront. The focus is policy- and results-based, assessing the 2022 activities in light of the established objectives.

The political focus is directed towards evaluating international cooperation in research and development (R&D), specifically asking the Prime Minister about its adequacy and successful partner countries. Another crucial topic is public health and vaccine safety, where concerns are highlighted regarding the lack of clinical trials concerning cancer risk and genetic damage. The questioning is aimed at monitoring the effectiveness and implementation of the policy.

The political focus is on the development of the education system and the management of change. The speaker supports the position that mature-age teachers are not a problem, stressing the value of experience and competence. At the same time, practical questions regarding the recruitment of young teachers and the successful implementation of changes within the educational network are paramount. These positions are geared towards finding solutions and ensuring policy effectiveness.

The political focus is on environmental policy and water management, emphasizing issues related to wastewater reuse and the reduction of pollutants (nitrogen and phosphorus). The question posed is policy-driven and centers on the necessary infrastructure investments, demonstrating moderate support for achieving environmental objectives. The speaker is seeking clarification from the government regarding the practical implementation of the policy.

The political position centers on a critical assessment of the draft bill, particularly concerning the issues of proving birth and obstetrics. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of statistical data to justify the bill's preparation and raises concerns about the risks inherent in the actions of dishonest actors operating in an international context. The framework itself is cautious and policy-driven, demanding a comprehensive risk analysis.

The political focus is on comparing the European Stability Mechanism’s (ESM) earlier risk assessments with the actual outcome. The speaker notes that the major fears and warnings voiced in the past have not materialized, which points to moderate confidence in the mechanism’s current functioning. The stance is policy- and results-based.

It focuses on administrative efficiency and land use regulations. The stance is policy-based and aimed at clarifying the scope of procedural bottlenecks (the exemption of land parcels from detailed planning), while showing moderate interest in the solution.