By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

No data available

The cooperation style is direct and respectful, involving approaching the minister to obtain information. This signals a readiness to engage with the executive branch through questions and clarifications concerning the implementation of the regulation.

The cooperation style is highly consensual, emphasizing that all procedural decisions (such as concluding the second reading and setting the time for the final vote) were taken unanimously within the committee. Furthermore, the text mentions informing stakeholders, which demonstrates an openness to external collaboration.

The speaker addresses the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court directly, posing questions regarding systemic problems, which signals a readiness for dialogue and for gathering information with the leaders of the justice sector.

The speaker demonstrates openness and a willingness to collaborate by respectfully addressing the server to solicit input on long-term economic strategy and career advice. He acknowledges the server's background as "an experienced, top-tier industry executive."

The speaker demonstrates the collaborative process by reflecting the positions and arguments of various stakeholders (the initiators of the draft legislation, the ministry, and representatives of the City of Tallinn). While consensus was reached in the committee regarding placing the drafts on the plenary agenda, clear disagreements persisted on substantive matters (namely, the rejection of the draft), which the speaker accurately reports.

There is not enough data.