By Agendas: Tarmo Tamm

There is not enough data.

The speaker calls upon all colleagues to support the draft bill, emphasizing the crucial importance of adopting a joint decision. International cooperation and support, facilitated by the Swiss government, were mentioned, highlighting an openness to external partnership.

The collaborative approach is respectful and constructive, involving politely addressing the server and acknowledging their work before asking a question, while simultaneously seeking clarification on the existing regulation.

It demonstrates cooperation within the Environment Committee, presenting nine technical amendments proposed by the committee and the committee’s joint decision to disregard Metsoja’s proposal. It emphasizes that key industry representatives were consulted during the preparation of the draft bill.

The style of cooperation is consensus-based, emphasizing that all decisions made by the leading committee regarding the further handling of the draft bill (placing it on the agenda, concluding the first reading, and appointing a representative) were reached by consensus. This indicates good cooperation among the committee members.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by strongly supporting the bill, despite the fact that it was submitted by the opposition. They call upon all members of the Riigikogu to support the bill, emphasizing the importance of the solution regardless of political affiliation.

The collaborative approach is open to compromise and the pursuit of consensus, indicating a mutual understanding reached during the discussion. Emphasis is placed on the willingness for long-term cooperation to revisit the topic within the committee.

The speaker represents the consensus position of the Economic Affairs Committee, emphasizing the thorough discussion of the draft legislation and the strong support it received (7 votes in favor, 1 abstention). The style of cooperation is consensual and procedural, focusing on finding a common solution.

There is not enough data.

The style of cooperation is highly consensual and accommodating, emphasizing that the Economic Committee was generally in agreement regarding the necessity of the draft bill. The decision to conclude the first reading was reached by consensus, which indicates strong cross-party cooperation on this issue.

The speaker urges all colleagues to support the draft legislation, which signals a desire to secure broad-based support for this initiative within the Riigikogu.

The collaboration style is open and respectful, formally addressing the rapporteur and seeking constructive recommendations for supporting and successfully implementing the government's economic plan.

The speaker is urging colleagues to reject the draft resolution, which indicates a desire to consolidate support for the position opposing the proposal. There is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise.

The style of cooperation is consensual and supportive, emphasizing that the decisions made in the Economic Affairs Committee regarding the forwarding of the draft bill and bringing it to a final vote were unanimous ("All decisions were consensual"). This indicates successful cooperation at the committee level.

The focus of cooperation is on the public sector's internal cohesion and direction, emphasizing that every politician and official must support economic growth through their decisions. The public sector must drive innovation, which requires the internal consolidation of resources and interests. Data regarding cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise is unavailable.

The style of cooperation is consensual, emphasizing that the committee members approved the draft unanimously ("consensually approved"). This points to successful cooperation and mediation between the Ministry of Climate and the committee members.