By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Tali

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and forceful, especially in its condemnation of the Moscow church's activities. Strong emotional comparisons are used, such as comparing Patriarch Kirill to radical mullahs who call for jihad. The appeal is a blend of historical facts and moral condemnation, emphasizing that the Moscow church worships not God, but the ambitions of the Kremlin.

The speaking style is forceful, motivating, and optimistic, emphasizing the necessity of immediate action and avoiding wasted time. Historical parallels are employed (Estonian independence, the withdrawal of Russian forces) alongside optimism ("Together we can do this") to counter the doubts of the opposition. The style is formal, yet it includes emotional appeals and clearly structured political demands (three key points).

The rhetorical style is insistent, serious, and resolute, focusing on emphasizing the brutal nature of war and the necessity of immediate action. Both logical arguments (the limitations faced by a small nation) and metaphors ("poker game") are employed to clarify the essence of deterrence. Opponents (Putin) are directly named as perpetrators of the crime of aggression and war criminals, which lends the speech a personal and value-driven intensity.