By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The tone is highly combative, ideological, and critical, especially directed at the opponents (the Social Democrats). The speaker employs sharp contrasts (entrepreneurship vs. redistribution) and demands a clear stance from the opposition. He levels strong accusations, referencing the opponents' rhetoric, which compares political parties to the mafia and Putinist Russia.

The style is formal ("good chairman/rapporteur"), but the substance is sharp and interrogative. Rhetorical questions are employed to cast doubt on the opponents' motives (e.g., fear of profit/loss aversion). In the third address, the rapporteur is accused of skillfully evading the core substance of the question, which demonstrates a desire to stick to the specific topic and hold them accountable.