Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position is strongly procedural and oppositional, focusing on adherence to the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu, especially concerning the bundling of amendments (Section 102, Subsection 2). The speaker sharply criticizes the inconsistency of the presiding officer and the actions of the bill's rapporteur, calling it a "crime against justice." The stance is forcefully directed at ensuring procedural correctness.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed expertise in the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and procedural regulations, particularly concerning the conditions for grouping amendments (Section 102, Subsection 2) and the voting procedure. This knowledge is focused on procedural nuances, emphasizing that only proposals submitted by the same proposer can be linked together.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, dramatic, and accusatory, employing powerful phrases such as "judicial crime" and "incompetent felon." The speaker poses numerous rhetorical questions and focuses heavily on exposing inconsistencies, all while expressing frustration that their specific questions are being ignored. The speech also includes personal attacks, specifically accusing the presiding officer of a "lack of manhood."
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in the second reading of the specific bill (257 SE), raising consecutive questions regarding the violation of procedural rules. Previous participation in debates last week was also noted, where questions were posed to the Social Democrat representative/minister, indicating regular involvement in opposition activities.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main targets of criticism are the bill’s rapporteur (Odinets) and the session chair, who are accused of violating procedural rules and inconsistency. The criticism is intense and sharp, ranging from procedural disputes to personal accusations (e.g., "judicial criminal"). No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, strict adherence to the rules is demanded.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the processing of the Draft Bill on the Protection of Whistleblowers Regarding Violations of European Union Law in the Workplace (257 SE). The speaker is acting in opposition to the handling of the draft, concentrating instead on the correct bundling and voting procedures for the amendments. Individual voting on amendments is required if the rules governing the grouping of proposals have been violated.
5 Speeches Analyzed