Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE)
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position focuses on the internal procedural fairness of the Riigikogu and guaranteeing the right of deputies to speak. The speaker expresses concern regarding Valdo Randpere's claims that he was prevented from speaking. The position is primarily procedural and aimed at monitoring the organization of parliamentary work, rather than the content of a specific draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the rights of members to take the floor. He emphasizes the need for statistical data to confirm or refute claims regarding the prevention of members from accessing the rostrum. Data is lacking concerning knowledge of the substantive bill (the Prosecution Act).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is interrogative and concerned, expressing fear regarding potential procedural violations. The speaker addresses direct questions to a specific colleague ("Jüri") and demands statistics to clarify the situation. The delivery is formal and logic-driven, focusing on establishing facts and justifications.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The records show a single intervention during the session, which was prompted by a colleague's allegations of procedural violations. The speaker characterizes himself as a "continuously young member of the Riigikogu."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is directed at procedural obstacles that allegedly restrict the right of MPs to speak (the Valdo Randpere case). The criticism is procedural and demands clarification on whether and by what such obstacles are justified. The intensity of the challenge is moderate, expressing rather concern and a desire to clarify the situation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is direct and information-seeking, addressing a specific colleague ("Jüri") to obtain clarification. The speaker then indirectly begins to support a colleague whose rights have allegedly been violated, emphasizing the protection of the rights of Members of Parliament.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The current legislative focus is on ensuring adherence to the Riigikogu’s organization of work and procedural rules. The speaker is not taking a stance on the substance of Draft Act 105 SE, but rather is acting as a claimant for procedural clarification to safeguard the rights of the members of parliament.
1 Speeches Analyzed