Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
Substantively supports the draft Act amending the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE), acknowledging the rapporteur's positions. Expresses concern regarding the medical system's tendency to channel individuals through the established system and create difficulties for those who choose alternatives. The political framework is a blend of value-based (autonomy) and procedural (quality of committee work) approaches.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Shows a strong grasp of parliamentary procedures, particularly regarding the competence of committees and the responsibilities of rapporteurs, while inquiring about "good practice." Has knowledge of the internal workings and pressure mechanisms within the medical system. Mentions specific topics discussed by the Committee on European Union Affairs, such as the directive on the energy efficiency of buildings, water quality, and product labeling.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on both substantive and procedural deficiencies. The speaker expresses appreciation for the presenter, who provided extensive background, but directs sharp criticism toward the commission representatives and colleagues (Pakosta) for deviating from the core topic. The aim is to gain clarity on the system and established best practices through dialogue.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The addresses were presented as questions and procedural inquiries during the first reading of the draft bill at the Riigikogu session. It also mentions participation in the European Union Affairs Committee discussion the following day, indicating active involvement in the committee's work.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism targets the bureaucracy and pressure within the medical system, which can end up "bullying" people. It sharply criticizes the committee representatives who deflect questions by claiming the topic was never discussed by the committee, as well as colleague Pakosta, whose answers deviate from the actual substance of the draft legislation. The competence of the board's decision is questioned, given the reference to selecting the wrong committee.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It is open to cooperation and recognizes rapporteurs who are thorough and include their own opinion, recommending that this approach be utilized going forward. As a solution, it proposes inter-committee consultation (e.g., the Legal Committee requesting input from the Social Committee) to overcome the deficiencies of specialization and ensure progress.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses primarily on the Riigikogu's internal legislative work and the processing of European Union directives. There is no direct focus on specific local or regional topics.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The discussion centers on social autonomy and individual freedom in making medical choices, particularly in the context of home birth. It expresses concern about systemic pressure that may impede people's choices and inquires about doctors' attitudes toward those who do not follow the established system.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary focus is the draft legislation amending the Vital Statistics Registration Act (Bill 106 SE) and ensuring the propriety of its handling. It stresses the importance of adhering to good parliamentary practice, requiring committee rapporteurs to be thoroughly acquainted with the substance of the bill. The matter of the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive is also being addressed.
3 Speeches Analyzed