Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to initiate proceedings in the European Union to invalidate the obligation to prepare sustainability reports" (601 OE)
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Political Position
The political stance centers on strong opposition to mandatory sustainability reporting, instead favoring a standardized, voluntary format. He emphasizes the consistency of his position since 2023 and criticizes the political hypocrisy (Kaja Kallas, Ursula von der Leyen) regarding broken pre-election promises. His framework is strongly policy- and results-driven, underscoring the necessity of reducing bureaucracy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a deep understanding of sustainability reporting regulations, the history of their processing within the Economic Affairs Committee and the EU Affairs Committee (ELAK), and the political shifts occurring within the European Union. They cite specific dates (October 9, 2023, March 19, April 7) and refer to previous disputes to establish their authority on the subject of reducing bureaucracy. Furthermore, they position themselves as an expert on future energy and forestry policies.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is combative, self-assured, and historically detailed, emphasizing the correctness of its earlier positions and the opponents' belated recognition. It employs political accusation (political technology, tactics of deception) and relies on logical arguments, referencing specific commission protocols and the timeline. It uses prediction tactics to underscore its political foresight.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker has been active in the discussions of the Economic Affairs Committee in the autumn of 2023, where he consistently voiced his opposition to the reporting requirement. He is actively participating in the current debate, immediately taking extra time and highlighting the role of his party (Isamaa) in initiating the draft legislation. He references previous disagreements with ministers and officials.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are members of the Reform Party (Kristo Vaga, Hanah Lahe), and on the European level, Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas. The criticism is sharp, accusing the opponents of hypocrisy, political technology, and employing the tactic of lying ahead of elections. He/She also criticizes Andres Sutt’s earlier opposition to his/her views within the Economic Affairs Committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker focuses on defending the actions of his party (Isamaa) and emphasizes that other politicians (such as Andres Sutt and the government) will eventually be forced to acknowledge the correctness of his previous positions. He notes that Isamaa took its cue from the policy shift of the leader of the European political family (Ursula von der Leyen), but only in the parts that were sensible.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly at the national and international level, addressing European Union directives (sustainability reports, the green transition) and Riigikogu proceedings. Regional focus is absent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
His/Her economic views are strongly geared toward reducing bureaucracy and regulations, taking a stand against mandatory reporting requirements. He/She advocates for voluntary action and supports simplifying the business environment to avoid imposing additional burdens on entrepreneurs.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is initiating and backing the repeal of the requirement to compile sustainability reports (Bill 601 OE). He highlights his involvement in initiating this specific bill (on March 19th) and is positioning himself as a key driver for future legislation regarding energy and forestry.
2 Speeches Analyzed