By Plenary Sessions: Kadri Tali

The language used is formal, analytical, and substantive, drawing on both historical context and logical argumentation to clarify the funding principles. The tone is critical of the current draft legislation but attempts to remain respectful, stating that the speaker does not wish to undermine today's initiatives. The emphasis is placed on logical appeal, focusing on the fitness for purpose and efficiency of the financial mechanisms.

The style is formal and centered on specific questions, respectfully addressing the presiding officer and the Foreign Minister. The address is brief, logical, and goal-oriented, focusing on obtaining information regarding the political idea's reception and the scope of its support base.

The style is formal and procedural, as this is a summary of a Cultural Committee meeting intended for the plenary session. The argumentation is balanced, incorporating both political viewpoints (Helle-Moonika Helme) and technical explanations (Margus Haidak regarding funding). The overall tone is neutral and focuses on conveying facts and decisions.