By Plenary Sessions: Kadri Tali

Economic considerations center on reducing the administrative burden (e.g., seasonal permits for sports events) and ensuring the sustainability of the financial system within the cultural sector. The necessity for meaningful solutions regarding the instructor salary support system is acknowledged. Furthermore, the legal certainty surrounding tax concessions for sports clubs (deductibility as training costs) was debated.

Economic perspectives are heavily focused on growth and investment, viewing culture and sport as an economic sector that generates added value. There is support for involving the private sector and assigning the state a leading role in developing new financing models that would incentivize entrepreneurs to contribute. Furthermore, it is recommended to examine global practices and review the structure of the gambling tax to ensure stable funding.

Our economic outlook is innovative and growth-oriented, viewing culture and sport as economic sectors that generate added value. Even during periods of fiscal discipline, we advocate for bold decisions and smart tax design to leverage private investment and generate significant tax revenue in the long term. The goal is to utilize the potential of the private sector instead of relying on the public purse.

Not enough data.

Economic standpoints emphasize fiscal discipline and reducing the administrative burden, seeking to eliminate the duplicate structures resulting from the income tax refund system. The objective is to reach a situation where only about 100 sports schools remain, down from the current 500, which points to a desire to optimize the national support system.

Economic considerations center on budget discipline, as securing 30 million euros within the state's budgetary strategy is challenging. A debate is emerging between universal benefits and targeted assistance to avoid providing aid to those who do not need it.

Economic considerations directly relate to the regulation of fees and social redistribution. Proponents of the bill seek to reduce the financial burden on parents (the 10% cap), whereas opponents (Lukas) stress the importance of maintaining the price differential and the overall range to support competition and smaller local governments.

Culture is treated as a significant economic sector and a national export, showcasing the country's talent and capability. Support is provided for investments in cultural infrastructure, which facilitates international cooperation, the sale and rental of productions, thereby ensuring financial support and growth.

Economic perspectives highlight culture and sport as vital economic sectors requiring stimulation. The speaker advocates for the involvement of private capital and the establishment of state-backed incentives to boost investment and foster economic growth. The position clearly favors business interests, underscoring an investment potential of nearly one billion euros.

The economic viewpoint is strongly focused on valuing education as an investment that necessitates greater public spending. Support is given to increasing teachers' salaries, and the coalition's efforts to secure the necessary 18 million euros for this are acknowledged. The necessity of ensuring a future supply of teachers through improved compensation is highlighted.

Education is treated directly as an economic sector and as an investment necessary to ensure economic growth. It is emphasized that resolving the shortage of qualified labor is economically critical. State investment in increasing teachers' salaries is supported, considering this a national priority even during uncertain times.

The economic outlook strongly emphasizes growth, innovation, and the involvement of private capital in the culture and sports sectors, with the goal of bringing these fields to the arena as fully realized economic industries. The speaker opposes state-led re-taxation and redistribution, arguing that such measures do not create the necessary conditions for growth. They advocate for a financial mechanism that would motivate entrepreneurs to contribute.

The economic perspective supports tying national resources to external defense, proposing a specific expenditure commitment (0.25% of GDP) for aiding Ukraine.

Economic perspectives address the efficiency of higher education funding, emphasizing the use of performance-based funding to incentivize universities to achieve desired outcomes. Specifically, the discussion focused on removing the indicator measuring the proportion of foreign students from the funding components while retaining the short-term international mobility indicator within the performance funding framework.

The economic view emphasizes the significance of education as an investment, which is necessary for the state to ensure a knowledgeable populace. There is support for adequate teacher compensation, and criticism is directed at investing in ignorance in other large sectors, where the sums involved dwarf the figures being discussed for education.