By Plenary Sessions: Kadri Tali

The style of cooperation is inclusive and comprehensive, systematically involving representatives from both the sports and culture sectors (the Estonian Olympic Committee, the Estonian Choral Association, and specialized federations) and local governments in the procedural process. Emphasis is placed on the need to find solutions through cooperation between ministries and stakeholders and to discuss the draft legislation at a calm pace.

The speaker emphasizes the critical need for cooperation between the state and the private sector, calling it the only viable option for improving the financing of culture and sport. At the beginning of the address, colleague Liina Kersna is thanked for her excellent presentation, which signals a readiness to acknowledge the contributions and support of colleagues regarding issues within the sector.

The speaker strongly emphasizes the need for cross-party cooperation and joint action in advocating for solutions, requesting the support of all members of the Riigikogu. The specific collaboration partner is Tanel Tein, and the institutional partner is the Foresight Centre (Arenguseire Keskus), with whose support a potential calculator has been developed.

Emphasis is placed on cooperation primarily within the party, underscoring the ability of Eesti 200 experts and the Minister of Education to lead change. The speech concludes with a call for all those present to support the draft Basic Education Act with their affirmative vote, noting the expectation of broad-based support.

The collaborative style was consensual and constructive, which was reflected in the unanimous decision to conclude the first reading. The cooperation involved close communication between the members of the Riigikogu committee and representatives of the Ministry of Culture, to ensure the clarity of the draft bill and the involvement of stakeholders.

A collaborative approach was evident in the commission's work, where consensus was achieved in appointing the rapporteur, but clear ideological divides emerged regarding the substantive matter. Representatives from various factions participated in the debate (Center Party, EKRE, SDE, Reform Party/Isamaa).

Helle-Moonika Helme called for consensus on the issue of early childhood education, noting that it is reflected in the platforms of all political parties. Despite this appeal, the committee decided to reject the draft bill (with 7 votes in favor and 3 against), demonstrating cross-party opposition to the specific legislative amendment. The committee appointed the rapporteur by consensus.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with colleagues within the Cultural Committee and calls upon the members of the Riigikogu to give their unanimous and heartfelt support when voting for the draft legislation. Cooperation with representatives of the city and various agencies has been ongoing, but ultimately fruitless, as these parties have only found excuses and raised obstacles.

The collaborative style is highly respectful and supportive, starting by wishing the Minister success in his work advocating for entrepreneurs. The speaker poses the question constructively, seeking shared solutions for stimulating the sector.

The speaker emphasizes the cooperation of the government coalition (Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats) in finding 5.5 million euros for wage funds from the administrative areas of the ministers. The efforts of the Minister of Education are also commended for negotiating with school maintainers and education workers to conclude a long-term agreement. The style of cooperation is supportive and focused on finding solutions.

The speaker adopts a cooperative stance, respectfully addressing the minister and urging colleagues to support the comprehensive approach to the education reform. They conclude with an appeal to back a charitable initiative, signaling a desire to find common ground even outside the political spectrum.

The speaker emphasizes active cooperation with colleagues (including Tanel Tein) and the Foresight Centre to develop a calculator assessing the potential for attracting private funding in the culture and sports sectors. This demonstrates an openness to solution-oriented collaboration when creating alternative funding models, highlighting the importance of public-private partnership.

The speaker is actively exploring cooperation opportunities, asking whether a "circle of like-minded" states or parties supporting similar ideas is emerging. This demonstrates an interest in creating an international coalition regarding the issue of supporting Ukraine.

The commission demonstrated a consensus-based approach regarding procedural matters, appointing the rapporteur and setting the date for the agenda. However, cooperation remained limited on substantive issues (support for the draft bill), culminating in a clear vote where the majority favored rejecting the bill. Tõnis Lukas proposed a compromise: that formal obstacles should be removed for doctoral theses written in Estonian, even if the majority of theses continue to be written in English.

The collaborative style is soliciting and inclusive, addressing all colleagues, including former and future Ministers of Education, and asking for support for the minister's plan. Emphasis is placed on shared responsibility and the opportunity to create a solid foundation for the future of Estonian education.