By Plenary Sessions: Kristina Šmigun-Vähi

The style is initially optimistic and supportive, expressing emotional approval ("my heart rejoices," "I am very, very pleased") regarding the Minister's action plan. The speaker poses a specific political question, using a logical comparison with Latvia to explore the possibilities of financial incentives.

The rhetorical style is interrogative and solution-focused, addressing the minister directly with a question regarding political viability. Logical arguments are employed, based on comparisons with the Nordic countries and stressing the necessity of speed and cost-effectiveness. The tone is formal, yet it also incorporates a figurative expression when describing potential manufacturers ("men with golden hands").

The speaker's style is polite and inquisitive, presenting their proposal more as an idea that has been brewing in their head. Simple, accessible language is used, emphasizing an emotional and value-based appeal (taking responsibility as "just a human thing"). The overall tone is rather reflective and constructive.