By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Sõerd

The style is analytical, critical, and logic-based, relying on concrete examples and facts regarding the system's inadequacy. The tone is serious and emphasizes the practical failure of the system, while maintaining polite language. He/She presents his/her views argumentatively, also employing rhetorical questions ("Why couldn't it be so?").

Overall, the style is highly formal, procedural, and detailed, particularly when introducing draft legislation, where logical and technical arguments dominate. However, when criticism is directed at the performance-based budget, the tone shifts to become sharp and direct, employing judgments such as "a total failure" and raising questions about the cost of the waste.