By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Sõerd

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and matter-of-fact, typical of a report presented by a steering committee. The discourse is logical and fact-based, focusing on explaining the procedure, citing dates, and quoting legal provisions. Emotional appeals are entirely absent; the objective is to convey information and ensure the transparency of the proceedings.

The rhetorical style is direct, formal, and challenging, posing questions that demand an immediate and detailed response. A logical appeal is utilized, based on recalling historical facts and demanding accountability (specifically, while serving in the government, holding the Finance Minister portfolio). The tone is confrontational and aimed at exposing the inconsistencies of the opponents.

The style is formal, analytical, and critical, especially concerning the opposition's draft bill, which is deemed superficial and flawed ("excessive defectiveness"). The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments, citing economic forecasts, legal issues (unconstitutionality), and factual errors in the draft bill's explanatory memorandum.