By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, starting by praising the presenter ("for a very, very good overview"). The focus is on logical questions and seeking solutions, avoiding emotional appeals.

The tone used in the commission reports is formal and detailed, concentrating on the citation of facts and discussions. During the plenary session, the style shifts to optimistic and visionary, stressing the long-term positive impact of early childhood education on society. This approach utilizes logical arguments, supported by data and international comparisons (Norway, PISA).

The style is formal and analytical, relying on political details and concrete financial figures (9.27 million, 100 euros per month). The tone is generally supportive, but becomes critical and urgent when discussing unqualified teachers (referred to as scandalous) and the injustice of the tax hump. Both logical arguments (cost savings derived from empty school buildings) and emotional appeals (historical injustice) are utilized.