By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

The speaker's style is formal, analytical, and persuasive, relying heavily on ethical and logical arguments while explaining the significance of the change in medicine. The presentation includes both questions directed at the minister (concerning palliative care resources and awareness campaigns) and a long, detailed explanation of the necessity of the draft legislation. The tone is optimistic and appreciative regarding the consensus that has been reached.

The rhetorical style is polite and respectful, beginning with an acknowledgement of the chair and the minister. The speech itself is analytical and logical, centered on contrasting the opportunities and threats within the context of artificial intelligence. Specific examples are employed, and a direct question regarding the strategic focus is posed, all while maintaining a neutral and investigative tone.

The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the presiding officer and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker employs logical argumentation, focusing on the historical context and technical impediments of the draft legislation. The tone is rather analytical and interrogative, emphasizing that the problems were anticipated from the very beginning.