By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

The rhetorical style is formal and initially conciliatory, starting with praise for the minister ("thank you for the very good work"). However, the subsequent tone becomes urgent and problem-focused, employing strong language (e.g., a "catastrophic" shortage). The presentation is logical and concentrates on finding a solution to a specific political question, relying on data and forecasts.

The language used is highly formal and polite, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the presenter for the comprehensive overview. The tone is inquisitive and procedural, focusing on facts and the outcomes of negotiations. There are no emotional or personal appeals; the emphasis is on acquiring logical and structured information.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, commencing with a polite expression of gratitude directed at the Minister. The speaker employs logical questioning and references academic authority, focusing on the resolution of technical and security issues. The tone is predominantly one of concern, highlighting the context of various crises (climate, economic, and political).

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, starting by thanking the Minister for the overview. The tone quickly becomes concerned and urgent, especially when the situation regarding teachers' qualifications is described as "catastrophic." The argumentation relies heavily on logic and specific statistical data, rather than emotional persuasion.