By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu

The rhetorical style is formal and pragmatic, emphasizing the unavoidable necessity of amending the constitution to ensure security. The speaker employs logical argumentation but does not shy away from emotional assessments, dismissing the opposing side's claims regarding the loyalty of Russian citizens as "complete rubbish" and calling absurd fears "ridiculous." The tone is decisive and stresses that the solution is the best one possible under the given circumstances, even if it isn't perfect.

The rhetorical style is highly conciliatory, appreciative, and optimistic, praising the discussion and the colleague for raising the topic. It employs both a formal address directed at the session chair and an informed, friendly address toward the colleague ("Dear Tanel!"). The speech is brief and focuses on the question requiring clarification.

The tone is urgent, serious, and decisive, emphasizing the gravity of the threat and the necessity of immediate action. It employs both logical arguments (details of the draft law, necessary amendments) and a powerful emotional framework, referring to Russia and China as "Axis of Evil states" and the aggressive concept of Russki Mir.

The speech is formal, serious, and urgent in tone, underscoring determination and readiness. The style is analytical and legalistic, repeatedly referencing the constitution and international law. Robust language is employed in describing Russia ("serial aggressor," "dictator Putin"), and a bleak outlook regarding the Ukrainian peace agreement is cautioned against.