By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu

Total Sessions: 4

Fully Profiled: 4

2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on national security and reforming the rules governing local government elections, specifically to shield Estonian politics from the influence of aggressor states. The speaker strongly advocates for amending the constitution to strip voting rights from citizens of Russia and Belarus, while simultaneously guaranteeing this right for citizens of Estonia's allied nations (the EU and NATO). This stance is both value-driven and pragmatic, arising directly from Russia's aggression in Ukraine and the persistent long-term threat.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker offers moderate and positive support for the sports sector, emphasizing the need for the state to nationally conceptualize the social contract and the necessity of sport. The focus is on a policy-based framework designed to provide a positive impetus to the field. The political stance aims for strategic clarity and the definition of the sector's societal role.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is heavily directed toward national security and the protection of critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, emphasizing the need for swift and decisive legislative action in the context of hybrid warfare. A firm stance is also being taken against the Moscow Patriarchate, viewed as a political tool of the Putin regime in Estonia. These positions are strongly value-based, pitting the democratic world against the "axis of evil states" (Russia and China).
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the defense of democratic values stemming from the constitution and the rule of law. Key priorities include securing Estonia's independence and sovereignty through active membership in the EU and NATO, alongside unwavering support for Ukraine. The overall stance is resolute and cautionary, stressing the necessity of preventing a repeat of the 1939 scenario due to both foreign and domestic political risks.