By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The style of cooperation is open and accepting, demonstrating strong agreement with the rapporteur on the primary political objective. The speaker is seeking solutions that transcend the framework of the current draft bill, which indicates a readiness for dialogue and the pursuit of broader consensus on complex issues.

The speaker relies on feedback from partner organizations that handle breeding and competition organization, noting that the government has failed to consult with them adequately. This indicates that the speaker actively cooperates with these interest groups and represents their concerns in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament).

The speaker stresses the necessity of adopting a cross-party approach when analyzing family policy, ensuring that it benefits the Estonian state. Furthermore, active cooperation and engagement with demographers are demanded to prevent the policy from being founded solely on a single ideological perspective.

The speaker acknowledges the previous speakers who have also addressed the topic, demonstrating awareness of the ongoing discussion and building upon it. The data does not reflect direct cross-party cooperation.

Information is limited. The address was presented as a direct challenge to the minister, which does not suggest a willingness to cooperate on the matter at hand.

In the proceedings concerning one draft bill (the Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child), no amendments were submitted by Riigikogu members, committees, or parliamentary groups, which suggests broad tacit approval or consensus regarding the ratification of this international treaty.

The speaker commends his colleague (Urmas) for taking the side of the people, demonstrating a willingness to support others who criticize the behavior of the elite. He also notes the presence in the chamber of representatives from other parties (Eesti 200, Helmen Kütt, Raimond Kaljulaid), suggesting a topic-specific interest that transcends the coalition lines.

The speaker points to inter-ministerial cooperation ("with a co-minister or a neighboring minister"), but offers a critical assessment, noting that this collaboration resulted in the withdrawal of funding. Ultimately, he demands that the ministers work together to ensure the funds are returned subsequently.

The speaker, on behalf of Isamaa, expressed a clear readiness to cooperate with the goal of improving political culture and debate culture. He emphasized that a politician must also listen to the opposition, signaling an openness to cross-party dialogue.

There is insufficient data.