By Years: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The speaker's style is highly formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the committee’s discussions and decisions. They use logical arguments and refer to expert explanations (ministers, deputy chancellors). Although most of their appearances are neutral presentations, they express personal concern regarding the failure to protect children's rights in custody disputes.

The style of discourse is highly formal, factual, and analytical, typical of a commission rapporteur summarizing discussions and decisions. The tone is predominantly neutral and measured, focusing on facts, the progression of the debate, and voting results. Emotional appeals are rarely employed, though ethical aspects (honor and dignity in the context of ministers' representation expenses) and the importance of the native language are emphasized.