By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann
Total Months: 14
Fully Profiled: 14
10.2025
2 Speeches
The speaker expresses a desire for collaboration, asking what steps should be started "together" to improve public sector efficiency and regain a leading position. This signals an openness to shared solutions and a readiness to act jointly in the implementation of artificial intelligence.
09.2025
18 Speeches
Siemann approaches his parliamentary work with a focus on cooperation, highlighting the lengthy discussions that took place in the committee and stressing that members were "fully engaged." He presents the committee's procedural decisions, which were made by consensus, demonstrating a readiness for cross-factional cooperation on procedural matters.
06.2025
3 Speeches
The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, particularly in legislative work. The speaker emphasizes the consensus achieved on procedural decisions made within the Constitutional Committee and commends the extensive inclusion process involving the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs and representatives from other institutions. He notes that the judiciary has received the draft bill favorably.
05.2025
7 Speeches
The style of cooperation is open and consultative, emphasizing thorough discussion with the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs and ministry experts. Regarding the draft court reform, a consensus decision to conclude the first reading was noted, which indicates a readiness for cooperation within the committee.
04.2025
1 Speeches
The speaker poses questions to the rapporteur, seeking solutions, which signals a readiness for cooperation and problem-solving within legislative or expert circles. Specific cooperation partners or coalitions are not mentioned.
01.2025
1 Speeches
The style of collaboration is consensual and procedural, conveying the discussion among the commission members and the position of the government representative (Mariko Jõeorg-Jurtšenko). It was noted that the commission understood the objective of the bill's initiator, although it decided to reject it, which suggests a pragmatic approach.
12.2024
5 Speeches
The speaker is acting as the representative for the steering committee, reporting the majority's positions and procedural decisions (for example, the votes to reject the proposed bills were 5:3 and 6:4). He appreciates constructive debate, noting that the discussion within the committee was better than in the full assembly, but emphasizes that his role is primarily to relay decisions rather than to seek compromises.
10.2024
2 Speeches
The collaborative style is collegial and referential, highlighting and acknowledging the arguments made by various colleagues (such as Jaak Valge, Hendrik Johannes Terras, Anti Allas, and Helir-Valdor Seeder) during the committee discussions. The speaker accepted the mandate to serve as rapporteur, which suggests a readiness to undertake procedural tasks.
09.2024
5 Speeches
The collaborative approach is open to engaging experts, highlighting the involvement of the leadership from both the Ministry of Justice and the State Electoral Service in the discussions. While the Commission achieved consensus on procedural decisions (such as adopting the agenda), members remained divided on substantive matters (supporting draft legislation), a split evidenced by the voting results.
06.2024
1 Speeches
The style of cooperation is consensual and open. The speaker emphasizes that the commission heard all arguments, and procedural decisions—including supporting the proposal and appointing a representative—were made by consensus. This points to a willingness to compromise and find common ground within the commission.
05.2024
4 Speeches
The style of cooperation is consensual and constructive. The speaker reports on the Constitutional Committee's consensual decisions during the processing of the draft bill for the appointment of a Supreme Court justice. He/She makes proposals to improve cooperation between training institutions and employers and seeks to find solutions for reducing bureaucracy.
03.2024
11 Speeches
The speaker stressed the substantive cooperation within the committee, which included representatives from the Ministry of the Interior and the Security Police Board, and involved discussions that crossed partisan lines. They demonstrated an openness to debate, noting that the objective was understood irrespective of party affiliation. Procedural decisions (specifically, the designation of the rapporteur) were adopted by consensus, even though the committee remained divided on the matter of rejecting the draft bills.
02.2024
7 Speeches
The style of cooperation is institutional, presenting the collective decisions and positions of the Constitutional Committee, having been designated as the committee's representative. The position of the Government of the Republic is noted, which also does not support the draft bill, thus indicating a political line similar to the government on the given topic.
01.2024
2 Speeches
The collaborative style is open and appreciative, commending the presenter's local government for the "smart decisions" it has made and the knowledge shared in a mentoring capacity. The speaker actively seeks input from experts, asking how the state can better support local governments.