By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The political position focuses strongly on ideological consistency and security issues. The speaker opposes the topic of voting rights for citizens of aggressor states in local elections and sharply criticizes the target's changing positions over time. The focus is on a value-based framework, emphasizing patriotism and political reliability, which justifies the motion of no confidence.

The political position is strongly oppositional and value-based, accusing the government (specifically the Reform Party and the Social Democrats) of catastrophic consequences and opportunism. The speaker opposes new taxes and tax increases, stressing that the government’s actions contradict the Reform Party’s former liberal principles. Regarding the tax bill, it is emphasized that it has only one objective: revenue generation.

The political focus is heavily centered on national security and financial transparency. The speaker firmly opposes granting voting rights in local elections to voters from aggressor states, arguing that this contradicts the Reform Party’s earlier stance. Furthermore, there is a demand for a detailed explanation regarding the impending increase in the tax burden, and criticism is leveled at the Kaja Kallas government’s political instability and policy reversals (e.g., subsidies for large families).

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, particularly the introduction of a wealth tax, which is deemed unconstitutional and unreasonable. The criticism centers on the procedural haste and the arbitrary nature of the proposed tax rates (initially 120 million, later revised to 200 million). This stance is heavily oriented toward rules and values, emphasizing the necessity of correct legislative procedure.