Priit Sibul

The most active participant was the questioner (PID: lbM-4Rz4iuw), who raised a detailed security policy issue concerning restrictions on weapon ownership and demanded a clear position from the government (position: other).

The most active speaker on this agenda item was Priit Sibul (pid GdeZmpb9biU). He presented several amendments and directed the discussion primarily towards clarifying procedure and the applicable mechanisms. His activity has been described as a speaker with a remarkably high proportion; his position was established as “muul” – meaning not a fixed party position (other).

The most active speaker was Priit Sibul (pid GdeZmpb9biU), the inquiry's compiler. His presentation demonstrated a leadership position in the discussion, and his role was primarily that of a leading inquirer and questioner, although the discussion touched on Rain Epler and other participants in several parts. Position: other (not directly a left- or right-wing representative role in this context).

The most active speaker regarding this agenda was the Minister of the Interior, Igor Tarole (ID: GdeZmpb9biU), who represented the government and provided a thorough overview of the current state of drone capability development and plans. His position is that of a member of the state government and he represents the government's administrative mandate, which places him in the “other” category on the political spectrum scale, not as a direct representative of the left- or right-wing line.

The most active speaker was GdeZmpb9biU, who represents a right-leaning impetus within the coalition, viewed in the context of the Ministry of Modern Affairs and Industry. He presented the concept of skilled labour and emphasized that the goal is not an influx of cheap labour, but rather the involvement of specialists with higher added value, and strengthening the role of cooperation between OSKA and the Chamber of Crafts. His position is central within the right-wing or centre-line government spectrum, and he conceptualizes policy from the perspective of economic growth and the development of national prosperity.

The most active speaker was Priit Sibul (Isamaa faction, right-wing). His participation and questions focused on the substance of the interpellation, and they suggest that he represents an active opposition or oversight role, but at the same time, he is attentive to state defense topics and participates constructively in all discussions.

Priit Sibul, a member of the Riigikogu, was the most active speaker associated with this inquiry (the main representative in terms of the discussion). His representation context is on the political position: other (a real shaper of the core school, neither right nor left).

The most active representative was GdeZmpb9biU, representing the position of Prime Minister Kristen Michali / the government. Political technical category: other.

The most active speaker is Priit Sibul (pid GdeZmpb9biU). The Isamaa faction, a far-right position. He presented and discussed several amendment proposals and led the voting phase regarding his faction's proposals. In the legislative position, Isamaa is typically on the right wing, which is reflected in his presence and language use in discussions.

The most active politician was Priit Sibul, the representative of the interpellators, who submitted the query and participated in the negotiations, sharply criticizing the proposed funding scheme as the creation of a "back door." Sibul represented the opposition's stance, calling into question the delegation of Parliament's decision-making authority and the reasonable use of public funds, especially concerning the two film studio projects.