By Plenary Sessions: Enn Eesmaa

The rhetorical style is formal, factual, and procedural, typical of a committee presentation delivered to the plenary session. Logical argumentation is employed, referencing specific dates, sessions, and consulted individuals to demonstrate the thorough preparation of the draft legislation. The tone is neutral and consensus-based.

The style is formal, procedural, and reflective. A personal framework ("I hoped," "I am truly sorry") is employed to express disappointment regarding the failure of a procedural initiative. The argumentation is logical, emphasizing the necessity of dialogue in a situation where the topics are already known. One line is brief and designated as an apolitical linguistic observation.