By Agendas: Enn Eesmaa

The address is supportive, constructive, and inquisitive in tone, directed straight at the leader of the initiative group. The style is balanced, incorporating both political acknowledgement (praising the cooperation) and a proposal (a referendum), which appeals to the wider public opinion.

The rhetorical style is polite, analytical, and constructive, beginning with strong praise for the presenter for their well-structured work. The address is geared toward a strategic discussion, centering on the logical argument concerning the necessity of finding allies at the EU level. The tone is rather inquisitive, seeking confirmation of the strategic direction.

The style is formal, factual, and procedural, focusing on conveying the work and unanimous decision of the National Defence Committee. The discourse is logical, relying on facts and official meetings, and is devoid of emotional or polemical elements. The objective is to inform the Riigikogu of the committee's position and rationale.

The style is formal and procedural, including references to colleagues and official roles (the presiding officer). The tone is analytical, yet it also conveys personal regret (specifically noted as 'tõsiselt kahju' – 'a real pity') concerning the failure of the intended tradition to take hold. The second address is brief, direct, and explicitly identifies itself as an apolitical observation.

The speech is formal and respectful, addressing the rapporteur using the title "Honored Rapporteur." The style is logical and question-oriented, emphasizing the justification for one's actions through the role of a people's representative, who must ensure public awareness.

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and fact-based, focusing specifically on the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the draft bill's schedule. The tone is neutral and authoritative, offering logical arguments and technical specifications (e.g., regarding legal protection and costs) while avoiding emotional appeals.

The speaker's rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural. The focus is on conveying facts and commission decisions, utilizing logical and pertinent language. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the objective is solely the transmission of information.

The rhetorical style is formal, structured, and interrogative, beginning with the general context before the specific policy question is presented to the minister. Fact-based references and diplomatic details are utilized to lend substance to the concept of the Nordic Army. The tone is serious and centered on strategic policy development.

The style is formal and businesslike, focusing on major and serious topics. The speaker uses the form of direct questioning, stressing the necessity of explaining complex issues to a wider audience ("the people") and ensuring public interest.

The style is extremely formal, procedural, and objective, closely resembling a commission report. The speaker employs logical appeals, relying on a chronological overview of the hearings and the positions taken by the ministries, while strictly avoiding emotional assessments. The complexity stems from the precise citation of legal terminology and specific statutory paragraphs.

The style is initially accommodating and appreciative, expressing sincere gratitude to the colleague for the initiative. The tone then shifts, becoming critical and personal, employing strong judgments ("My personal opinion is this," "absolutely does not belong there"). The speaker uses rhetorical sarcasm, making reference to the sheer number of dining establishments in Tallinn.

The rhetorical style is formal and measured, emphasizing a desire to avoid an accusatory tone, even though a pointed question about responsibility is being raised. The speaker first offers acknowledgment, and then shifts the focus to problems that remain unresolved and inquires about the obstacles.

The speaker's style is apologetic and personal, focusing on explaining a technical or procedural error ("my fingers were nervous"). The tone is informative and non-confrontational.