By Months: Andrus Seeme

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful ("Esteemed Minister!"), but the content is sharp and interrogative. The speaker employs logical argumentation, referencing the minister's previous claims and posing direct questions regarding deficiencies in policy implementation (e.g., the magnitude of the savings and the creation of vacant premises).

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, addressing the chairman and the presenter directly. The speaker employs a logical approach, seeking specific examples and assessments to ascertain the practical utility of the draft proposal, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, directly addressing ministers, the vice-chairman, and the Chancellor of Justice. The speeches are logical and rely on concrete examples (e.g., the closure of customer service in Põlva County and complaints lodged by agricultural enterprises). The overall tone is one of concern, particularly regarding the state's withdrawal from regional areas and the corresponding increase in bureaucracy.

The style of the address is formal and respectful, acknowledging the Minister with appreciative words ("a pleasant and substantive presentation"). The rhetoric is question-based, focusing on the logical gathering of information concerning implementation processes.

The speaking style is formal, polite, and inquisitive, utilizing official forms of address ("Esteemed Chair," "Dear Minister"). The tone is neutral and focuses on the logical need for information, requesting that the substance of the concept be elaborated upon. The speaker expresses thanks for the presentation, which highlights a constructive approach.

The style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly addressing the recipients as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." The rhetoric is question-based and analytical, focusing on obtaining data and quality assessments. The tone is measured and professional, while also including a personal positive assessment (that Estonian lawmaking is "quite well").