By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The language used is formal, critical, and demanding, employing emotionally charged terms such as "disorder/chaos" and "to force happiness upon others." The emphasis lies on logical and legal argumentation, directly questioning whether specific behavior is "culturally correct and also substantively sound" and compliant with the law.

The rhetorical style is critical, direct, and argumentative, presenting a direct challenge to the presiding officer's interpretation. Although the argumentation is legal and refers to the law, emotional terms such as "false," "unjust," and "creates additional tensions" are also used to emphasize the seriousness of the situation. The speaker is formal and focuses on logical persuasion through law and precedent.

The tone is extremely critical, serious, and urgent, describing the situation as a matter of national survival and expressing "deep concern." Both emotional (sense of security) and logical arguments are employed, highlighting specific government measures that are painful for families. The speaker uses repetition and emphasis ("not a single syllable!") and challenges the minister to present a positive program.