By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker is strongly opposed to the Social Democratic Party minister and the coalition at large, criticizing their vague stance on the border treaty and the voting rights of Russian citizens. Criticism is also leveled at the actions of the parliament speaker, who stands accused of a gross violation of the rules of procedure.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Riigikogu Board and the session chair, who are accused of inconsistent interpretation of the law and allowing parliamentary culture to deteriorate. The criticism is procedural and intense, demanding that the Board establish a unified practice.

The primary opponent is the Government of the Republic and the ruling coalition, who are criticized for poor political choices and a leadership crisis that has driven Estonia into a tax war against its own people. The criticism is directed both at the political substance (the car tax contradicts security policy) and the procedures (the unconstitutional linking of amendments). Instead of compromise, the demand is to halt the reading of the draft legislation entirely.

The main confrontation is aimed at the Reform Party-led government, sharply criticizing their economic choices (tax hikes) and security policy. The opposition's stance is intense, accusing the government of shifting responsibility onto external factors and refusing to own up to its mistakes. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.

The main criticism is directed at the current Riigikogu Board, who are accused of insufficient work organization and protecting the political culture. The criticism is procedural and focuses on performance capability, arguing that Reinsalu is capable of organizing the parliament's work better.