By Plenary Sessions: Maido Ruusmann

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with praise for the minister's presentation ("Aitüma," "kiidaks"). The tone is concerned, describing the regional situation as critical, yet when posing the question, it remains pragmatic, focusing on a logical solution (EU funding).

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, concentrating on political precision and fact-checking. The tone is corrective and challenging, particularly when he directs the presenter's attention to the mitigation measures agreed upon in the coalition agreement, questioning whether that information somehow escaped their notice.

The rhetorical style is optimistic, constructive, and supportive, praising the minister's presentation as "promising" and "moving Estonia forward." It employs formal language and metaphors (such as infrastructure being the "circulatory system"). The appeals are balanced, combining logical arguments (economic benefit, security considerations) with value-based standpoints (regional political significance).

The speech is formal and respectful, addressing the Prime Minister directly and referring to him/her as "a very wise person." The tone expresses concern regarding regional issues, but the style is solution-oriented and inquisitive, seeking immediate and practical recommendations. The appeal is primarily logical and politically focused.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and concerned, emphasizing the gravity of the subject ("my concern is serious"). The speaker employs logical argumentation, referencing an external authority (Kapo) to substantiate the claim that inequality constitutes a security risk. The tone is more inquisitive and solution-oriented, rather than confrontational.

The style is polite and respectful, beginning with an expression of thanks for the positive message from the President of the Bank of Estonia. A logical, question-focused approach is employed, seeking analytical data and recommendations aimed at preventing regional inequality.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the rapporteur. An analytical and questioning approach is employed to clarify the objectives of the law amendment and to cast doubt upon the motives behind the opposition's actions. The tone is primarily logical and procedural.

The style is formal, respectful (when addressing the Deputy Speaker and the Minister) and interrogative, yet critical in substance. The speaker presents the problem as a stark fact ("is known to all") and demands that the Minister discuss a broad-based strategy. The emphasis is on finding logical and comprehensive solutions.