By Agendas: Signe Riisalo

The collaborative style is very open and consensus-driven. It is stressed that the decisions of the Social Affairs Committee were consensual, and readiness is expressed to cooperate during the amendment proposal phase to improve the legislation. Recognition is given to the government for the draft bill, as well as to other parties for their participation in the discussions.

The speaker emphatically stresses the necessity of a societal consensus and broad cooperation concerning family policy issues. They highlight a positive common ground with colleagues from Isamaa (Lea Danilson-Järg) and the Social Democrats (Riina Sikkut), who share the perspective regarding the complexity of the required solutions.

The speaker emphasized the strong cooperation with disability organizations, noting that negotiations with them lasted half a year. He referenced the foundation initiated by former minister Mart Võrklaev and stressed that the organizations themselves proposed the relief measures. The style of cooperation is open to input and preferences from interest groups.

The politician begins with an acknowledgement, indicating a readiness for constructive dialogue, but simultaneously demands a clear answer and amendments to the policy of inclusion.

The collaborative approach is highly inclusive and consensual, emphasizing the involvement of 25 stakeholders in the discussions, including the Health Insurance Fund, the Chamber of People with Disabilities, and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The committee's procedural decisions, including the proposal to conclude the second reading, were adopted by consensus.

The collaborative approach underscores the necessity of ministerial support for advancing complex topics (such as daylight saving time) and revitalizing the discussion at the European Union level. The immediate legislative action (a motion for rejection) is being put forward in the name of the Reform Party faction, which points to faction-based cooperation. Furthermore, reference is made to questions and debates raised by colleagues during the session.

The style of cooperation is appreciative, acknowledging the ministry's positive steps (such as retaining the Astangu Centre under its jurisdiction). However, critical questions are simultaneously being raised regarding the lack of a future vision and policy deficiencies. A constructive dialogue is sought to find solutions.

The speaker is highly collaborative, thanking colleagues on the Social Affairs Committee and expressing hope for continued cooperation with ministry experts. The necessity of finding flexible and better solutions for managing waiting lists through collaboration is emphasized.

The speaker defends the engagement process, acknowledging the government's initial shortcomings but stressing that these were compensated for by two additional engagement sessions organized by the Social Affairs Committee. He/She points out that all parties were invited and no major disagreements remained unresolved, suggesting a readiness for compromise at the committee level.

The style of cooperation is inclusive, seeking to address stakeholders' concerns through additional discussions; for instance, all parties were invited to the session on April 21st. Cooperation with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications regarding technical amendments is also mentioned. Furthermore, reference is made to previous successful collaboration with the Social Democrats in implementing the care reform, demonstrating a readiness for cross-party work in the social sector.

The style of cooperation is open and inclusive, emphasizing the necessity of involving all parliamentary groups and stakeholders for a thorough discussion of this sensitive topic. Consensus support from the Legal Affairs Committee is noted, and all members of the Riigikogu are encouraged to submit amendments. The Minister has agreed to present the draft bill to the various parliamentary groups.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial; it is emphasized that all procedural decisions within the Social Committee (appointing a representative, placing the draft legislation on the agenda, proposing the final vote) were adopted by consensus. The speaker is prepared to discuss proposals from committee members regarding the inclusion of future topics on the agenda.