By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The style of cooperation is confrontational; the speaker criticizes the coalition partners for their submissiveness and notes that the coalition voted down Isamaa's substantive amendments aimed at improving the budget position in their entirety. No willingness to compromise is shown regarding the tax hump, which they demand be postponed.

The style of cooperation is oppositional, centered on the Isamaa faction presenting and forcing through alternative supplementary budget proposals. The search for compromise is not mentioned; instead, emphasis is placed on the fact that coalition partners have begun to hesitate concerning the Reform Party's tax hump.

The style of cooperation is oppositional; emphasis is placed on Isamaa's independent proposals and the creation of alternatives to the government's policy. There is no mention of a desire to cooperate with the coalition; instead, the government is called upon to heed the voters' signal and adjust its policy. Isamaa intends to present a comprehensive alternative supplementary budget.

The cooperative style is evident in the joint fight against the car tax alongside opposition partners (Helir-Valdor Seeder, Priit Sibul, Rain Epler). Within the chamber, however, the style is confrontational, focusing on challenging the presiding officer’s decisions and accusing the coalition of ignoring the voices of 80,000 people.

Domestically, there is no reference to a compromise, representing the position of the Isamaa faction regarding the motion of no confidence. Internationally, the need to consolidate like-minded countries is emphasized in order to adopt a common legal position concerning the Russian elections, citing the appeal made by the Ukrainian state.