Agenda Profile: Urmas Reinsalu
Second reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill (Draft Act on the Supplementation of the Earth Crust Act), focusing on highlighting its constitutionality and procedural flaws. The position is based on both policy and law, pointing out that the explanatory memorandum for the draft bill references a non-existent law. Furthermore, the need to take into account the radical protests by large industrial enterprises is also emphasized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures and legal analysis, referencing specific analysis points (15 and 16) from the Riigikogu Legal Department and the content of the draft bill’s explanatory note. They are also knowledgeable about the main representatives of the oil shale industry (VKG, Kiviõli Keemiatööstus) and the energy policy obligations associated with the European Union’s Recovery Plan.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is corrective and critical, often expressing surprise regarding the opposing party's claims ("I am surprised"). The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments and facts, utilizing direct references to documents and posing sharp rhetorical questions concerning the legitimacy of the proceedings.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data on activity patterns is sparse, confined to one active appearance in the Riigikogu during the second reading of a specific bill (2024-12-11).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opposition is directed at the bill's spokesperson ("Mait") and government representatives, who are being criticized for contradictory positions and procedural errors. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unconstitutionality of the bill and the disregard shown toward the protests of entrepreneurs.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and international obligations (the EU recovery plan and the phasing out of oil shale use). Economic interests related to the Ida-Virumaa region are indirectly emphasized, with reference made to specific oil shale industry companies.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The text expresses concern regarding the protection of the interests of large industrial enterprises (specifically the oil shale industry), highlighting their strong opposition to the planned regulation. The underlying economic perspective aims to shield existing industrial sectors from potentially binding environmental obligations imposed by the government.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is opposing the draft amendment to the Subsoil Act (Bill 435 SE). The speaker highlighted the bill's procedural and legal shortcomings, demanding clarity on both its potential unconstitutionality and the basis for its processing under the Climate Act.
1 Speeches Analyzed