Agenda Profile: Marek Reinaas
First reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto (368 SE)
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is clearly supportive of ratifying the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Estonia and Pakistan. Although certain issues were raised in the committee (such as the 12.5% withholding rate), the treaty is considered a vital catalyst for boosting trade. This stance is procedural and politically oriented toward approving the international agreement.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the legislative procedure, including the work of the leading committee, the closing of readings, and deadlines for amendments. Detailed knowledge regarding the content of the international tax treaty is also presented, specifically explaining the rationale behind the 12.5% withholding rate. Furthermore, specific trade facts concerning Estonian exports (refined petroleum products, scrap metal) and imports (leather products) with Pakistan are highlighted.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, which is typical for a committee rapporteur. The speaker employs logical appeals, presenting a fact-based overview of the Finance Committee's discussions and decisions. The tone is concise and purposeful, focusing on advancing the legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is connected with representing the steering committee before the Riigikogu plenary session, providing an overview of the committee's sittings and decisions. Specific dates are mentioned (February 19) and changes to the session schedule (a delay due to the minister's absence).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No direct confrontation is expressed, but critical questions raised in the committee by other deputies (Aivar Sõerd, Rain Epler) regarding the content and significance of the agreement are referenced. The criticism was policy-based (the tax percentage, the importance of the trade partner), and factual answers were provided in response.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is consensual and procedural, as the speaker is presenting the leading committee’s joint proposal to conclude the first reading. He calls upon the chamber to agree with the committee’s decision, citing the clear and substantial debate held within the committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on international relations and Estonian national policy, addressing the tax treaty between the two countries (Estonia and Pakistan). Emphasis is placed on Pakistan's potential role as a trade partner for the Estonian economy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives favor the promotion of international trade, viewing the agreement as a means to boost commerce with Pakistan. The discussion centers on preventing tax avoidance and addressing the technical details of withholding taxes, which are crucial for protecting business interests.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the ratification of the agreement between Estonia and Pakistan for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to income taxes (Bill 368 SE). The speaker supports the bill and is acting as the procedural lead, concentrating on the motion to conclude the first reading and setting the deadline for submitting amendments.
2 Speeches Analyzed