By Plenary Sessions: Reili Rand

The rhetorical style is confrontational, accusatory, and insistent, particularly regarding the government's priorities, referring to incentives for entrepreneurs as "gifts." Strong rhetorical questions are employed to highlight the injustice of the government's choices and to compel the Prime Minister to respond. The follow-up question stressed that the Prime Minister had left the answer "totally unaddressed."

The rhetorical style is passionate, formal, and insistent, conveying frustration and offense regarding the ridicule the topic has faced from colleagues. The speaker balances emotional appeals (moral obligation, the vulnerability of women) with strong logical arguments, drawing upon international law, research, and statistics. The speech concludes with a clear call for ratification on behalf of the Social Democrats.

The style is formal, analytical, and question-focused, addressing the presenters and the minister respectfully. He/She uses both emotional expression (joyful feelings, "Kaua tehtud kaunikene" [A long time in the making, a beautiful thing]) and logical argumentation, referring to specific data (2,500 people, a fivefold difference in cost). The rhetoric is aimed at challenging the consequences and the expediency of the policy.