Agenda Profile: Reili Rand
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The political stance is highly critical of the government's actions, especially regarding the minister's accountability for the improper transposition of the directive and the potential fines that may follow. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of ensuring the capacity of the Competition Authority, particularly concerning the investigation of cartel agreements, while simultaneously criticizing the government's budget cuts. The primary focus is on political accountability and the effectiveness of the government's performance.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in competition law and administrative structure, specifically referencing the redundancies and resource requirements within the Competition Authority's cartel investigation unit. Knowledge of the legislative history of the draft bill and the requirements for transposing the EU directive is also highlighted. Technical terms are employed, such as "correctly transposed the directive" and "cartel agreement investigators."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, interrogative, and accusatory, focusing on political accountability and procedural shortcomings. Logical appeals are employed to highlight the minister's evasion of responsibility and the consequences of reducing the capacity of the Competition Authority. The tone is formal, but includes direct accusations regarding a political reversal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data are limited to two speeches on a single sitting day, which concern amendments to the Competition Act. Other patterns of activity, events, or meetings are not mentioned in the speeches.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition's stance is directed against Eesti 200 and the Reform Party, who are accused of politically obstructing the processing of the draft legislation and changing their minds, a shift attributed to the change in party leadership. The Minister is directly criticized for avoiding responsibility and potentially pressuring cuts at the Competition Authority—criticism that is essentially political and procedural.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker spoke favorably of the Social Democrats, specifically citing the amendment they put forward regarding the introduction of the original draft text. This indicates a readiness to cooperate with other opposition parties in formulating specific legislative solutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is placed on national laws and institutions (the Competition Authority) and international obligations (the transposition of the EU directive). There is no regional or local focus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views stress the importance of robust competition enforcement, especially regarding the investigation of cartels. Government cuts that reduce the capacity of the Competition Authority are criticized, citing the necessity of protecting the market from unfair activities and ensuring compliance with the law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the draft Act amending the Competition Act (609 SE), emphasizing the correct transposition of the directive and the securing of resources for the Competition Authority. The speaker is acting as a critical scrutinizer of the bill, raising questions regarding accountability and the procedural history, and supporting the amendment proposal put forward by the Social Democrats.
2 Speeches Analyzed