Agenda Profile: Reili Rand
Draft law amending the Basic Education Act, the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia, and other laws related thereto (establishing the obligation to attend school) – First Reading
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
Politically, the platform advocates for reducing unreasonable regulations, viewing this as a positive step forward. The core tenet is strong support for increasing school meal subsidies to guarantee the quality and accessibility of food, irrespective of a family's financial standing. This stance is motivated by social justice and deep concern over rapidly escalating food prices. The overall political framework is value-based, stressing the role of school meals as an essential equalizing measure.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates expertise on the topics of school meal funding, organic food subsidies, and public procurement rules. Uses specific economic facts, citing Estonia's fastest food price growth in the European Union and the resulting impact on family budgets. Skillfully connects issues of social policy (family finances) and regional policy (local food producers).
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is analytical, concerned, and consistent, particularly on the topic of social inequality, which is addressed in subsequent questions. Rhetorical questions are used to emphasize the injustice (e.g., is it acceptable that children receive different quality food). The style is formal, focusing on logical arguments concerning social justice and economic pressure.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The critique does not directly criticize individuals, but rather opposes a political situation where the quality of school meals depends on a family's financial means. It criticizes the lack of funding that obstructs initiatives for healthier school food, as well as the delays in updating procurement regulations. The criticism is aimed at the absence of political solutions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It recognizes positive prior initiatives, such as the establishment of the organic food subsidy under the minister’s leadership, indicating a readiness to acknowledge previous achievements. It actively seeks cooperation and initiatives from the Rural Affairs Committee to address the school food issue.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It emphasizes the importance of local food producers, noting that the price tag should not be the deciding factor at the expense of local, high-quality ingredients. It focuses on how state funding impacts local food production and the supply chain.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports national grants and expenditures aimed at subsidizing school meals to alleviate the economic burden on families. It emphasizes that rising prices (the fastest increase in the EU in Estonia) directly impact daily choices, and prioritizes social equality over cost savings.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on social justice and education, emphasizing the necessity of guaranteeing high-quality school meals for every child, regardless of the family’s financial means. It views school meals as a crucial equalizing social measure that helps prevent children from skipping meals for economic reasons.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It supports the objective of Draft Bill 644 SE to reduce unreasonable regulations. The primary focus is directed toward initiating draft legislation to amend school meal support and updating procurement rules in order to address the problem of funding shortages.
4 Speeches Analyzed