By Months: Juku-Kalle Raid

The rhetorical style is extremely concise, direct, and unusually well-informed, including a literary quotation. A simplifying and humorous comparison ("simple as a trouser button") is employed to underscore historical justice.

The rhetorical style is sharp, historically grounded, and polemical. Strong analogies and shocking comparisons are employed (Kirill's submission is compared to submitting to Hamas imams) to discredit the opponent's position. The speaker addresses colleagues directly, asking them to confirm that the nature of the Russian church has not changed, using the ironic phrase, "the Stalinist sun is simply Putinist."

The rhetorical style is predominantly aggressive and sarcastic, laden with personal insults and utilizing derogatory terms such as "freeloaders" and "pervert costume." This abruptly shifts to an unexpected and solemn tone, featuring a quote from Juhan Viiding’s poem to emphasize the value of work and bread. The speaker also employs an ironic and roundabout reference to the words of "the great leader and teacher" concerning how to find a solution.

The style is formal and procedural, but incorporates slight irony or provocation, using a procedural question to express a personal viewpoint. The speech is short, concrete, and focuses on clarifying the situation, concluding with a personal and direct denial.

The rhetorical style is formal, detailed, and procedural, focusing on the presentation of facts and dates with the aim of clarifying a technical situation. The tone is generally neutral and descriptive, but it includes a slight note of surprise regarding the rapid processing of the draft ("very strange speed").

The speaker's style is direct, procedural, and at times critical, especially when casting doubt on the motives of opponents. He uses colloquial expressions (e.g., "täie lituudiga," "pätti teed") when discussing social issues, emphasizing the logical connection between rights and responsibilities. He also employs rhetorical astonishment to criticize the behavior of opposing parties.

The speaker's rhetorical style is passionate and resolute, employing strong emotional terms such as "false idol" and "horrors." They rely more heavily on historical narratives and personal anecdotes (the story of Aili Jõgi, their own childhood experience) rather than on dry data. The style is confrontational at times, particularly when challenging the Social Democrats' argument regarding cohesion, and utilizes sharp digressions.