By Months: Juku-Kalle Raid
Total Months: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
04.2025
1 Speeches
The opposition is directed at the historical legacy and ideology symbolized by the "Estonian SSR" and the reference to the "old career communist." The criticism is rather principled and rooted in historical context, not aimed at specific contemporary political opponents.
02.2025
2 Speeches
The main opposition is aimed at the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who are accused of direct allegiance to Kremlin forces and declaring genocide a holy war. The criticism is intense and principled, linking the Russian Church with the Stalinist and Putinist regimes. Reference is also made to EKRE's internal "schizophrenic incident," although the speaker ultimately agrees with their columnist's position.
12.2024
8 Speeches
The main confrontation is directed at the Eesti 200 party, which is being criticized both for political untrustworthiness and for making stupid jokes. Intense personal attacks are being deployed, especially targeting Gaute (Kivimägi), who is labeled a "freeloader" and whose clothing is mocked. The criticism is both political (concerning agreements) and personal/style-based.
10.2024
1 Speeches
The speaker indirectly contradicts Lauri Laats's claim that Jürgen Ligi insulted all members of the Riigikogu, specifically by denying that they were personally insulted. The opposition is procedural and personal, rather than politically substantive.
06.2024
1 Speeches
No direct confrontation is expressed, but the speaker draws attention to the unusual speed of the proceedings concerning the bill submitted by the EKRE faction. The criticism is aimed at the procedural speed rather than the political substance.
05.2024
2 Speeches
The main opponents are Isamaa and EKRE, who are criticized for taking up the defense of the Moscow Patriarchate, a stance considered contradictory to their nationalist identity. The criticism is intense and aimed at questioning the motives of the opponents. He/She also criticizes procedural delays that prevent them from moving on to the agenda items.
01.2024
5 Speeches
The main opposition is directed at the Social Democrats, whose argument for coherence in the context of the 'red monument' is considered "absolutely arbitrary" and "ridiculous." Furthermore, he criticizes the initiators of the draft bill (including Jaak Valge) and the committee for failing to fully consider the monument's future fate, deeming the proposal "simplistic."