By Agendas: Juku-Kalle Raid

Insufficient data

The speaker is presenting the viewpoint of the Estonia 200 faction, thereby demonstrating internal cooperation and unified support for the draft legislation. The appeal for support is addressed to all colleagues ("Dear colleagues!"), signaling a desire to gain broad-based backing.

The speaker addresses his "confused colleagues," urging them to acknowledge the historical continuity and the enduring nature of the threat posed by the Russian Church's activities. This points to a desire to reach a consensus and firm conviction regarding the bill they are supporting.

The working style is sharp and ironic towards colleagues, even when addressing them. There are no indications of bilateral or cross-party compromise; instead, a sarcastic and didactic tone prevails.

The speaker references a prior agreement cited by other parties (Eesti 200, Jaak Aab), suggesting a potential cross-party consensus regarding the raising of limits. The cooperation style is controlling, seeking to ensure that this agreement holds firm.

The speaker refers to the Foreign Affairs Committee’s generally consensual working style, noting that there have not usually been "very heated debates" there. This indicates a preference for smooth, low-conflict cooperation at the committee level, regardless of the faction that initiated the draft bill.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and an openness to dialogue, referencing a previous discussion with a party colleague from the opposing side. The style is compromise-seeking, presenting their condition in the form of a question in order to find a solution to the legislative problem.

The collaborative style is evident in the mention of the colleague (Toomas Uibo), referring to previous discussions or a shared memory of procedural violations. The primary objective is to achieve efficiency in the session, rather than inter-party compromise. Data concerning broad-based cooperation is absent.

The speaker first establishes common ground (both are smokers) before presenting a provocative proposal, which suggests a communication style that is familiar yet challenging. Cooperation is not directly offered; rather, a challenge is issued based on that mutual understanding.

The speaker observes a broad consensus regarding the necessity of relocating the monument, noting that "the entire Riigikogu is actually of one mind." While acknowledging the need to fully consider the implications, they refuse to align with the Social Democrats' position on the issue of societal cohesion. Finally, support is expressed for EKRE's stance on this particular question.