By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The rhetorical style is formal and question-focused, addressing the presenter politely. A specific, real-life example (anecdote) is employed to illustrate a broader political issue, thereby balancing logical argumentation with practical concern. The tone is concerned, yet professional and solution-oriented.

The style is extremely combative, critical, and accusatory, particularly toward the minister, who is accused of ignoring the Riigikogu and displaying "extreme arrogance." Sharp criticisms are employed (e.g., "completely unheard of," "absurd"), and emphasis is placed on procedural injustice and the assertion of falsehoods. The tone is formal yet emotionally charged, demanding order and accountability.

The rhetorical style is critical, insistent, and concerned, utilizing strong evaluations such as "absurd," "unprecedented," and "anomaly." The speaker relies on logical arguments and references to past events (the PPA scandal) and foreign incidents (Latvia) to underscore the gravity of the situation. The overall tone is formal yet emotionally charged, emphasizing the necessity for immediate action.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and forceful, employing strong emotional appeals and historical parallels (the events of 1940) to dramatize the current situation. Sharp and unconventional language is used ("bullsh…", "blatant lie," "cesspits"), and the deliberate destructiveness of the government's actions is emphasized. The speaker poses many rhetorical questions and concludes on a pessimistic note, seeing the future "in the darkest colors."