By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The speaker is challenging Estonia's 2004 decision to accede to the Ottawa Convention (the ban on anti-personnel landmines), arguing that military considerations were not adequately taken into account. He puts forward a strong security-based argument, emphasizing the effectiveness and low cost of mines as a defensive measure, referring to them as "the poor man's atomic bombs." He seeks to initiate a debate regarding the potential reversal of this decision given the current geopolitical climate.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's tax spree, particularly the motor vehicle tax, emphasizing its devastating impact on the economy and public welfare. This stance is heavily focused on outcomes, accusing the government of lying and driving Estonia into the deepest recession in Europe. The speaker stresses that the government's actions are forcing people to make an impossible choice: either own a car or put food on the family table.

The political platform is fiercely opposed to the current government, focusing specifically on the failures of economic policy and immigration. The speaker stresses the urgent necessity for digitalization and automation, while simultaneously criticizing the government's policies that encourage the import of cheap, low-skilled foreign labor. A firm position is also adopted on the issue of child protection, favoring national solutions over cross-border ones. The criticism is primarily aimed at the effectiveness of the government's actions and its underlying value choices.