By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and political theory. The speaker uses a concrete example (the Centre Party) to illustrate broader political phenomena. The overall tone is measured and rather reflective than emotionally charged.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, employing standard forms of address for the session chair and the presenter. The tone becomes urgent and critical when addressing integration and language issues, where strong language is used, such as "absurd waste of taxpayers' money." Both economic and security-based arguments are presented.

The rhetorical style is formal and courteous in addressing the session chairman and the presenter, yet sharp and critical in substance. A rhetorical question is employed, coupled with the assumption that a scandal of such a high caliber must have had an impact, thereby underscoring the necessity of accountability. The tone is probing and demanding.

The rhetorical style is urgent, critical, and alarming, emphasizing the security threat and the government's inaction ("the bomb is already ticking," "the state is still in a dormant state"). It uses strong imagery (Estonia as a "secret entrance to Europe") and balances emotional appeals (social catastrophe) with factual data and international comparisons. It concludes with a direct call to support the bill.

The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, directed toward the session chair and the Prime Minister. The speaker adopts a direct and interrogative tone, making a logical appeal for the investigation of a potential causal relationship.