Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-02-26
Political Position
The speaker is focusing on the detailed scrutiny of draft legislation, particularly in the areas of science ethics and nature conservation (specifically, wolf hunting). The stance is cautious and inquiry-based, stressing the necessity of avoiding conflicts of interest (referring to paid services in science ethics) and ensuring that the legislative changes have a positive impact on agriculture and producers. The overall framework is heavily policy- and regulation-driven, seeking out potential deficiencies in the implementation of the proposed bills.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of both nature conservation (wolf hunting permits, the role of alpha males in the pack) and research ethics regulations. Specific details are used, such as 15 unused hunting permits and a 3,000 euro fee for processing research ethics cases. The presenter is also referred to as "the greatest expert in the field of animals," emphasizing the need to rely on specialized expertise.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is highly formal, respectful, and focused on questions, utilizing standard forms of address such as "Respected Chairman of the Session! Dear Presenter/Minister!". The speaker poses logical and detailed questions, seeking to identify the risks, limitations, and potential inequalities associated with the implementation of the draft legislation, while avoiding emotional appeals.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was highly engaged during the February 26 plenary session, putting a series of questions to both the rapporteur and the minister concerning various pieces of legislation. This engagement highlights active participation in the legislative debate and effective substantive scrutiny of the bills.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the mechanisms and potential risks of the draft legislation, not at individuals or political groups. Specifically, questions are being raised about how conflicts of interest will be prevented when providing paid services related to research ethics, and whether the wolf hunting policy might actually create more problems. There is no direct opposition or personal attacks; the focus remains on procedural accuracy.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
While the topics are national (science ethics, hunting regulations), the focus within nature conservation issues is clearly directed at resolving the problems of agriculture and producers. The objective is to help farmers and producers better handle problematic wolf packs, highlighting a concern for the rural economy.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses concern regarding the economic difficulties faced by farmers and producers due to wolf packs. The question is also raised whether the paid mechanism for processing research ethics cases (up to 3,000 euros) creates unequal accessibility for researchers, which points to the desire to ensure fair financial access to these regulations.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The text focuses on social issues concerning the participation of adolescents (aged 15 and over) in scientific studies without requiring parental consent. It emphasizes the need to ensure the maturity and protection of these young people, raising questions about potential limitations (such as drug trials) and the rationale behind the chosen age threshold.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main priorities are linked to regulations concerning nature conservation and research ethics. Specific focus will be placed on establishing a new commission for handling research ethics misconduct cases and clarifying the age limit for the independent participation of minors in scientific research. The speaker serves as the detailed scrutinizer of the draft legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed