Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
2024-10-23
Political Position
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the legal basis for the government's actions (reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate) and defending the institutional role of the Riigikogu against criticism from ministers. The criticism is directed at both the policy level (illegal decisions) and the level of values (respect for Parliament). The speaker expresses deep skepticism regarding the government's ability to make legal and functional decisions, citing the previous failed confiscation of a monument.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of opponents' previous statements and behavior, accurately quoting Jürgen Ligi's anti-women insults and the finance minister's criticism directed at the Riigikogu debate. Expertise is also visible in matters of legal procedures and the role of parliament, especially concerning the motion of no confidence and the state budget procedure. Furthermore, there is knowledge of the government's previous legally questionable steps, such as the confiscation of the monument to freedom fighters.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharply critical and confrontational, especially during the debate on the motion of no confidence, where extensive documentation regarding the opponent's personal insults is utilized. The style is a blend of procedural skepticism and direct emotional attack, culminating in the question, "What is wrong with you?" The tone is formal, but the substance is highly personal and accusatory, emphasizing the ministers' unethical conduct and the disregard shown toward parliament.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The modes of operation are confined to addressing the plenary session and posing questions to ministers and the presenters of draft bills. All appearances are recorded on a single session day, which indicates active participation in the debates and inquiries taking place during the plenary session.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is intense and directed at several ministers. Jürgen Ligi was criticized solely for his personal behavior, misogyny, and anti-women insults, with a long list of specific quotes being presented. The Minister of Finance was criticized for underestimating the role of parliament and disparaging the quality of the debate. The government as a whole is suspected of making illegal decisions in the context of reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data. The speaker's focus is on asking questions and criticizing ministers; there are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national legislative and institutional issues, such as the state budget procedure, reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate, and the role of parliament. There are no references to specific regional projects or communities.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data. The speaker criticizes the Finance Minister’s attitude toward the budget debate and the Riigikogu’s role in the budget process, but does not express specific economic positions regarding taxes, expenditures, or fiscal discipline.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, the discussion heavily focuses on the sexism and degradation of women prevalent in political discourse, presenting a detailed list of Jürgen Ligi’s insults directed at various female politicians and a journalist. Furthermore, the text addresses the issue of reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate, calling into question the effectiveness and legality of the government’s proposed legal solution.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on questioning the legal foundation and viability of the draft bill aimed at curtailing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate. Equally important is the procedural role of the parliament, which includes the state budget process and safeguarding the right to hold no-confidence votes against ministers. The speaker operates in the capacity of a critic of these drafts and a procedural watchdog.
5 Speeches Analyzed