Agenda Profile: Evelin Poolamets
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political stance focuses on the motion of no confidence against Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, which is motivated by his repeatedly expressed negative and humiliating attitude towards women and his underestimation of the parliament's role in the budgetary procedure. This position is strongly value-based and targets the minister's conduct and his suitability for the office. One speaker directly questions whether the Riigikogu should even have the right to express no confidence in a minister, thereby casting doubt on the minister's respect for the parliament.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speakers demonstrate knowledge of the content of the Finance Minister's previous public and private correspondence, focusing on his personal insults and his assessments regarding the role of parliament. They are able to quote several specific insults directed at various female politicians and journalists. There is no evidence of expertise in the economic or technical fields.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational, accusatory, and personal, particularly when presenting a detailed list of insults and posing the direct question, "What is wrong with you?" Strong emotional appeals are employed, emphasizing the unethical and humiliating nature of the minister's conduct. The third speech is more formal, utilizing quotations regarding the minister's previous procedural assessments concerning the budget debate.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The only known information is participation in the Riigikogu session during the debate on the motion of no confidence against the Minister of Finance. The speakers are taking part in the collective action of the 29 Riigikogu members who submitted the motion of no confidence. No data is available regarding other patterns of activity.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary target is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is facing intense criticism for his personal conduct, misogynistic insults, and the humiliation of parliament. The criticism is largely personal and procedural, focusing on the minister's inappropriate language (for example, referring to women as a "crocodile" or a "corpse abuser"). The intensity of the attack is high, with the ultimate goal being the minister's removal from office.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speeches were delivered as part of a motion of no confidence initiated by 29 members of the Riigikogu, which points to cooperation among the factions supporting the no-confidence vote. There is no evidence of seeking compromises with the government or engaging in bilateral cooperation. The style is confrontational rather than open to collaboration.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The information is insufficient. Although the first reading of the state budget bill is referenced, the focus is on procedural criticism regarding the role of the Riigikogu, not on economic policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A strong emphasis is placed on the topic of gender equality and norms of public conduct, highlighting the minister's repeated humiliating and insulting remarks directed at female politicians and journalists. The social issue is framed as a matter of dignity and respect in public life. Particular emphasis is placed on the humiliation of women and the denial of their representation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the Riigikogu's right to oversight and the procedure for handling motions of no confidence. Furthermore, the minister's previous statements, which questioned the Riigikogu's role in the state budget process, are being criticized. The speakers are the initiators and supporters of the motion of no confidence.
3 Speeches Analyzed