By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and direct, respectfully addressing both the chair and the presenter. This is a purely logical and analytical question, the purpose of which is to obtain clarification regarding the practical implications of a complex legal issue. Emotional appeals or anecdotes are not used.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, direct, and emotional, particularly when addressing the Prime Minister. Sharp accusations of lying and spreading "nonsense" are used, and the Prime Minister is demanded to show self-control ("Pull yourself together!"). At the same time, this style is combined with fact-based questions (drones, the Lithuanian bank tax), and the urgency of the topics is emphasized.

The rhetorical style is highly polemical, emotional, and accusatory, employing strong language (e.g., "nest of illegals," "colony from the time of Karl Vaino," "it is disgusting to watch the Russification of Tallinn"). Appeals are made to national sentiments, historical continuity, and the question of state honor. The tone is predominantly critical and demands immediate action, with direct and accusatory questions being put to the ministers.